Part of the Spiritual Experience pillar — what it looks like to walk this out with others.
Heart-locked — what community actually requires
There are two ways to be part of a community. One draws from it as a resource. The other walks with it, heart to heart. They can look identical from the outside. They feel entirely different from the inside.
I want to share something I processed recently — not because it’s resolved, but because the unfinished parts might be exactly what’s useful.
In a community gathering, someone mentioned they were also learning from another teacher elsewhere — and that teacher had a different framework for something we’d been exploring together. It was a small moment. Offhand, even. But I noticed something complex moving in me beneath the surface, and I knew I was going to have to sit with it.
Dealing with what came up first
The first thing I had to acknowledge — before I could get to anything useful — was the pride and jealousy that had surfaced. There was a flicker of competition. A sense that something I’d been building was being compared, or diluted, or measured against something else.
If I’d tried to skip past that and gone straight to the more sophisticated question underneath, the whole thing would have stayed contaminated. So I stayed with it. I let Paul’s flow do its work — I do the things I don’t want to do, I don’t do the things I do want to do… thanks be to God through Christ Jesus. I breathed it out. I blessed the other teacher, genuinely. And I felt the frequency shift. The competition dissolved. Shalom.
That took a few minutes. It always takes a few minutes. And it’s always worth it — because what it revealed underneath was far more interesting than the jealousy itself.
The deeper question
Once the pride was out of the way, I could look at what was actually there. A genuine question about community — about what it means to walk together when people are drawing from different streams, different teachers, different frameworks.
This isn’t a simple question. And it’s not an accusation against anyone. It’s a realisation about two fundamentally different postures — two ways of being in relation to a community — that can be almost invisible until you name them.
One is a position of “I’ve learned something important elsewhere, and that’s what I’m bringing.” There’s a sense of separation — drawing from this community as one resource among several, each assessed on its merits.
The other is hearts locked together — walking a shared journey, where different flavours and influences are welcomed, but the bond is the primary thing. The content serves the relationship, not the other way around.
Neither of these is about agreement on every point. You can walk heart-locked with someone and disagree with them. You can draw from a resource and find it genuinely life-giving. The difference isn’t intellectual — it’s relational. It’s a question of where your heart is anchored.
Why this matters more than the teaching
Here is what I kept coming back to: the heart-locked posture is not just a nice relational extra on top of good teaching. It might be the deepest thing we’re actually after.
We spend a lot of time in this community working with mystical frameworks — the seven spirits, the nature of the heart, the body’s role in transformation. All of that is real and important. But underneath all of it, what we are actually practising is union. Oneness. The dissolution of the defended self into genuine, risky, open-hearted togetherness.
If that’s the destination, then the posture we bring to community isn’t incidental to the journey. It is the journey. A community of hearts genuinely locked together — trusting, processing, walking — is not just the context for the teaching. It is the teaching made visible.
Content without union is still just information. Union is the thing that transforms.
An unfinished thought, left unfinished deliberately
I’m not going to wrap this up cleanly — because I don’t think it is clean yet, and pretending otherwise would be exactly the wrong move for a piece about authentic community.
What I can say is this: the hunger for hearts-locked community is real in me. The question of how you build it, how you protect it without becoming possessive, how you remain open without losing the thread of shared journey — that’s alive and unresolved.
There’s a measure of vulnerability in putting that in front of you. But I think vulnerability might be part of the answer. Not vulnerability as performance — but the genuine, undefended kind. The kind that says: I don’t have this figured out, and I’d rather process it with you than present you with conclusions.
A few questions worth sitting with
Do you recognise the difference between these two postures in your own experience of community?
Have you ever noticed the pride or competition that can arise when someone else’s framework enters the room — and what happened when you processed it honestly?
What would it look like, practically, to move from drawing-from-a-resource into something more genuinely heart-locked?
This is what community looks like here.
Not a content delivery service. Not a resource to draw from at a distance. A walk — together, hearts open, processing in real time. If that’s what you’re looking for, the Academy is where it happens.
Continue reading
Three hearts
The ancient architecture of transformation — Kardia, Nous, Dianoia — and why the pride that surfaced here is exactly what those chambers are designed to process.
Something is happening to us
What the Spiritual Realities community is actually about — and why it isn’t a content platform or a self-help group.
Spiritual Experience pillar
More on what the journey looks like when walked together — the fringe, the curious, the ones finding their way in.
